| 1 |
Paul S. Bains wrote: |
| 2 |
> Perhaps I misunderstood the poster - unused, uncompiled code cannot be |
| 3 |
> loaded into RAM, unless you editing it. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yep. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Unused compiled code can, but |
| 8 |
> that is beyond the realm of the user. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
No, it's not. IIRC, this thread at some point of time was |
| 11 |
about setting USE flags. With USE flags, the user can control |
| 12 |
what gets compiled and what not. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> If the developer has functions |
| 15 |
> that are not ever being used, then that's the developer's fault. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Or the packagers, for not proving enought options of what |
| 18 |
gets installed. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
The nice thing about Windows is - It does not just crash, it displays a |
| 23 |
dialog box and lets you press 'OK' first. |
| 24 |
(Arno Schaefer's .sig) |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives