| 1 |
On Wed, Feb 15 2012, Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Paul Hartman |
| 4 |
> <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> Nvidia-drivers fails with package collisions |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> * Detected file collision(s): |
| 9 |
>>> * |
| 10 |
>>> * /usr/lib32/libnvidia-compiler.so |
| 11 |
>>> * /usr/lib32/libcuda.so |
| 12 |
>>> * /usr/lib32/libcuda.so.1 |
| 13 |
>>> * /usr/lib64/libnvidia-compiler.so |
| 14 |
>>> * /usr/lib64/libcuda.so |
| 15 |
>>> * /usr/lib64/libcuda.so.1 |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> But the owner of all these (via a symlink) is the currently installed |
| 18 |
>>> version of nvidia-drivers. For example |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> ajglap gottlieb # equery b /usr/lib32/libcuda.so.1 |
| 21 |
>>> * Searching for /usr/lib32/libcuda.so.1 ... |
| 22 |
>>> x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-290.10-r1 (/usr/lib32/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia/libcuda.so.290.10) |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> ajglap gottlieb # ls -l !$ |
| 25 |
>>> ls -l /usr/lib32/libcuda.so.1 |
| 26 |
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Feb 13 19:29 /usr/lib32/libcuda.so.1 -> OpenCL/vendors/nvidia/libcuda.so.290.10 |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>>> So I don't really see the collision. Is the correct procedure |
| 29 |
>>> |
| 30 |
>>> 1. Copy the 12 files (both ends of the 6 links) someplace else |
| 31 |
>>> 2. Get out of X |
| 32 |
>>> 3. Try the emerge again |
| 33 |
>>> |
| 34 |
>>> thanks, |
| 35 |
>>> allan |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> Are the collisions with owned files, or just files that it doesn't |
| 38 |
>> know about? i use protect-owned so it will overwrite any unknown |
| 39 |
>> files, but abort on files owned by another known installed package. If |
| 40 |
>> portage does not report them as owned by another package I think it's |
| 41 |
>> usually safe to override (unless you have been installing things |
| 42 |
>> outside of portage). |
| 43 |
>> |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> It may be related to all the OpenCL stuff that was just included in |
| 46 |
> this last set of nvidia-driver packages. Possibly the ebuild hasn't |
| 47 |
> handled the new stuff correctly? |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> - Mark |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
Perhaps. All the files are links to files with OpenCL in the path. |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
But I am still unsure what to do. |
| 54 |
I mentioned a three step procedure above. |
| 55 |
Perhaps best is to do nothing and hope -r2 will come along and |
| 56 |
install cleanly. |
| 57 |
Toward that end should I file a bug at bugs.gentoo.org? |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
allan |
Archives