| 1 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:01:19 +0200 |
| 2 |
meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2 |
| 5 |
> finally. |
| 6 |
... |
| 7 |
> Especially "masked by: missing keyword" let me doubt whether |
| 8 |
> or not it is sane to migrate.... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> How to proceed here ? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'd suggest to delay the update 'till it hits stable. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
"Stable" and "testing" are different branches, after all, and if you |
| 15 |
mix them, results should be pretty much unpredictable, since both are |
| 16 |
tested as-is. |
| 17 |
So any package in your ("stable") branch will have baselayout-1 |
| 18 |
compatible script running with openrc and baselayout-2 scripts, which |
| 19 |
are _known_ to be incompatible in some cases. |
| 20 |
Of course, hitting "stable" branch should mean that package spent some |
| 21 |
time in "testing" and init-script has been modified to be compatible |
| 22 |
with both branches, but still I doubt that the overal result should be |
| 23 |
more stable than "testing" branch, since no-one has really tested your |
| 24 |
particular package mix. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net |
Archives