| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote |
| 3 |
>> I'm having a somewhat disgusting issue on my Gentoo: binaries are |
| 4 |
>> unaccountably large. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> "-fno-unwind-tables" is the extra flag I have that you don't have. |
| 8 |
> See http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.busybox/36695 for a short |
| 9 |
> discussion ".eh_frame bloat issue - solution found". The busybox people |
| 10 |
> go to extreme lengths to keep the size of busybox to a minimum, so you |
| 11 |
> can't go wrong by following their example. I assume that you do not |
| 12 |
> have debugging enabled. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Just tried it, no difference. The point is that the same flags should |
| 15 |
yield similar results, and I'm getting the worst results on my Gentoo |
| 16 |
system. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
+1, BTW... |
Archives