1 |
On 7/18/06, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> What do you guys do when you want to try the masked version of a |
3 |
> package to fix a problem you're having with the stable version, but |
4 |
> you don't want to follow the ~x86 version indefinitely? I've just |
5 |
> been adding the package to package.keywords, but that obviously |
6 |
> follows the masked version until you remember to remove the entry. Is |
7 |
> there a better solution? |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
Use the operators (~,>, <, =) and specify the version. |
11 |
|
12 |
-- |
13 |
Daniel da Veiga |
14 |
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil |
15 |
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
16 |
Version: 3.1 |
17 |
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- |
18 |
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ |
19 |
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |