| 1 |
On 12/31/05, Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sunday 01 January 2006 02:57, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Oh, and yes, java is ~x86 both in unmask and in keywords. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Can you list exactly what sun-jdk lines you have in |
| 7 |
> /etc/portage/package.{unmask,keywords} please? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Of course. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Oops!!! I thought I checked this yesterday -- maybe I screwed it up, |
| 13 |
but there's nothing in .unmask, although keywords is fine. |
| 14 |
Anyway, after a quick edit, they are: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
treat ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.unmask |
| 17 |
dev-java/sun-jdk |
| 18 |
dev-java/sun-jre-bin |
| 19 |
dev-java/java-sdk-docs |
| 20 |
treat ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords |
| 21 |
dev-java/sun-jdk ~x86 |
| 22 |
dev-java/sun-jre-bin ~x86 |
| 23 |
dev-java/java-sdk-docs ~x86 |
| 24 |
treat ~ # |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I'm not sure how to tell which virtuals of the great many in the |
| 27 |
/etc/portage |
| 28 |
tree I'm using, but I know I have never edited any of that stuff. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Make.conf does not even mention virtual (according to grep -i virtual |
| 31 |
/etc/make.conf) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Anyway, I re-emerged the 1.4 Java, and at least my emerges are going |
| 34 |
through now. That was my one bit worry, now resolved. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
++ kevin |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
Archives