| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr. |
| 2 |
<daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> -- |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On March 17, 2012 at 12:19 AM "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com> |
| 8 |
> wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken |
| 11 |
>> > |
| 12 |
>> > |
| 13 |
>> > |
| 14 |
>> > Happy Computer Users (for now), systemd is on your horizon. |
| 15 |
>> > |
| 16 |
>> > Houston, we have a problem! |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> You can always try Walter's et. al. mdev replacement: |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> http://www.waltdnes.org/mdev/ |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Sad fact is systemd will soon be required in Gentoo. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I don't think so. Not in the near future at least. Of course, *I* |
| 26 |
don't think that will be a sad fact, but that's another matter :D |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> Forget the udev/mdev argument ... |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Oh, I have never cared that much for it ;) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> systemd is poorly coded, |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Many people think that it tries to solve a problem that "doesn't |
| 35 |
exists", or that it has failures in its design. However, even the more |
| 36 |
fervent critics agree that Lennart is a really good programmer. You |
| 37 |
are the first person I read saying that systemd is "poorly coded". |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
In other words: [citation needed] |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> and we're |
| 42 |
> getting so much further from a good, reliable DE to compete with the likes |
| 43 |
> of Windows 7. Just horse manure DEs in Gentoo now. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
I would say that we are actually better than them in several ways. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Regards. |
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 50 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 51 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives