| 1 |
On 2006-01-04 17:45:46 +0000 (Wed, Jan), Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:25:52 -0800 (PST) maxim wexler |
| 3 |
> <blissfix@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | Is there a default, eg for LICENSE, in an ebuild if |
| 5 |
> | the ebuild's author can't discover it? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Not for LICENSE. If you can't find the LICENSE, you can't legally |
| 8 |
> distribute or use the software so you can't make an ebuild for it. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
skoot@cthulhu ~ $ cat /usr/portage/licenses/secretware |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
You are not authorized to know under what conditions you may use this |
| 13 |
software. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You are not authorized to know whether you may use, modify, distribute |
| 16 |
modified and unmodified versions of this software. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
You must not violate any restriction placed by this license. Failure to |
| 19 |
do so will cause you to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, |
| 20 |
according to the rules that you are not authorized to know. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
skoot@cthulhu ~ $ |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Are you sure you WANT to make an ebuild for this software? ;-) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
P.S.: |
| 28 |
Do you know of any package that uses the D&R license? |
| 29 |
And do you know any user of such package? :-)))) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
No virus found in this outgoing message. |
| 33 |
Checked by "grep -i virus $MESSAGE" |
Archives