| 1 |
On 10/04/17 18:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed |
| 5 |
>> on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an |
| 6 |
>> executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so |
| 7 |
>> its up and running. I've now just updated clang, from a working 3.9.1 |
| 8 |
>> to a 4.0.0-r1 and clang has now disappeared. If I type in "clang |
| 9 |
>> --version", I get "command not found". "whereis clang" only gives me |
| 10 |
>> the library dir. Doing "ls -la /usr/bin/cla*" gives me "No such file or |
| 11 |
>> directory" |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Try "qlist clang" so see what is installed, "qlist clang | grep bin/" |
| 14 |
> should find the executables. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> qlist is part of portage-utils, which you probably already have. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Done as requested. There are 41 files found with clang in their name |
| 21 |
and they are all on the dir: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
/usr/lib/llvm/4/bin/ |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I'm no whiz bang sys-admin but that doesn't seem right to me. There is |
| 26 |
clang and clang++ and a whole lot of stuff sym linked to provide all the |
| 27 |
various permutations and combinations of names in there. But there is |
| 28 |
nothing in my path that points to that dir. I'll have to have a look at |
| 29 |
the ebuild to see if a symlink or something is not being applied. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Any other thoughts appreciated, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Andrew |
Archives