Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Any consequences to package.mask'ing newer kernels?
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 05:07:15
Message-Id: 20070402050232.GA1761@waltdnes.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Any consequences to package.mask'ing newer kernels? by Neil Bothwick
1 On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 09:21:22AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
2
3 > At around 300MB per kernel, that's ten excess kernels, so you can't be
4 > doing it that often.
5
6 I ran df and ll between each individual unmerge. The individual
7 kernels take approx 250 megs, freshly emerged. Compiling generates
8 another 200 megs worth of object code, etc. Here's partial output of
9 "ll" before the cleanup. Note that 2.6.16-r7, 2.6.17-r7, and 2.6.18-r3
10 were compiled, as well as the current 2.6.19-r5.
11
12 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 744 Sep 6 2006 linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r13
13 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 744 May 4 2006 linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r6
14 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1488 Oct 14 02:14 linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r7
15 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 744 Jun 13 2006 linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r9
16 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 712 Jul 29 2006 linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r4
17 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1448 Sep 6 2006 linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r7
18 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 744 Sep 16 2006 linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r8
19 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 712 Nov 12 09:01 linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r2
20 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1328 Feb 17 18:51 linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r3
21 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 712 Dec 24 22:14 linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r5
22 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 712 Jan 14 20:15 linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r6
23 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1328 Mar 8 19:32 linux-2.6.19-gentoo-r5
24
25 I don't mind the 30 or 40 megs for the source tarball+patches in my
26 distfiles directory. But the quarter gig for each minor "r" bump, most
27 of which I never build, is a bit much.
28
29 --
30 Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> In linux /sbin/init is Job #1
31 Q. Mr. Ghandi, what do you think of Microsoft security?
32 A. I think it would be a good idea.
33 --
34 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Any consequences to package.mask'ing newer kernels? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>