| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 08:46:32 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> So, you think most of the KDE users were happy to see support for KDE3 |
| 6 |
>> being dropped, especially considering KDE4 was much less than stable? |
| 7 |
>> For me and a lot of others, it was worthless at first. It was good eye |
| 8 |
>> candy but not functional even for the little I do. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> I didn't switch until 4.3 or 4.4, KDE 3.5 worked fine for me up until |
| 11 |
> then. It probably still works just as well now as part of the Trinity |
| 12 |
> project. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Which supports my point. Maintain KDE3 until KDE4 is stable and |
| 17 |
usable. If it is still working, which I think it is tho some fixes have |
| 18 |
had to be made, then why couldn't KDE support KDE3 just a little while |
| 19 |
longer. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Dale |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
:-) :-) |
Archives