| 1 |
Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 2 |
> So, any progress/updates on the attempt to replace udev with busybox's mdev? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> As for my case, it's working well on XenServer and VMware ESX / |
| 5 |
> vSphere (haven't found the time to test a VirtualBox installation |
| 6 |
> yet). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Except for one annoyance: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Now, I've done the steps put forth by waltdnes here: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/242563 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> ... but every "eix-sync&& emerge -avuD @world" finds me having to |
| 15 |
> re-edit /usr/portage/virtual/dev-manager/dev-manager-0.ebuild, or else |
| 16 |
> portage wants to emerge sys-apps/makedev and sys-fs/static-dev |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Is there a way to 'force' portage to use the edited |
| 19 |
> dev-manager-0.ebuild and not the original version pulled in by |
| 20 |
> eix-sync? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Rgds, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Question: Is this going to be added to the shiney new Gentoo wiki at |
| 26 |
some point? The wiki needs some more content for sure. ;-) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I didn't know if ya'll had thought of this before or not. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Dale |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
:-) :-) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives