| 1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 07 January 2010 21:19:27 Stroller wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I hope my above statements don't sound nasty, but you want 3.5, Alan |
| 5 |
>> [1] wants KDE 4. The various developers upstream of you and Alan - |
| 6 |
>> i.e. both KDE and Gentoo - don't have time to work on both. So they |
| 7 |
>> have each chosen where to spend their time, and that's on KDE 4. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> [snip] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> [1] Some hypothetical Alan who does not really exist. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Ahem <cough><cough> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I *think*, but not sure, that I feel offended by being mythicalisized[2] |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> [2] Some hypothetical word that truly does not exist. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Lucky for us, the Red hats and SuSEs of this world will maintain at least |
| 23 |
> critical security flaws in KDE-3.5 that Gentoo users can import into kde- |
| 24 |
> sunset: those distros shipped KDE-3.5 and are still actively supported |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Should we also assume that Redhat and SuSE is doing that support, not |
| 29 |
KDE who is the one that dropped KDE 3.5 ?? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Dale |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
:-) :-) |
Archives