| 1 |
On 02/04/2019 09:23 AM, Laurence Perkins wrote: |
| 2 |
> Have you tried firejail? It gives you convenient ways to set up the |
| 3 |
> container parameters consistently and is in the repo. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
No, I have not. Thank you for the pointer. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Its invocation is also simple enough to not clutter up your startup |
| 8 |
> scripts. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't think I mind adding things to start up scripts. I'm more |
| 11 |
looking for the most Gentoo<ish> way to do what I'm wanting to do |
| 12 |
without relying on something on top of Gentoo. So if that involves |
| 13 |
adding things to start up scripts, I'm cool with it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I just don't want to add an entire subsystem, like Docker (et al), if I |
| 16 |
don't actually have to. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm starting to wonder if I'm going to be better off writing new scripts |
| 19 |
that will match existing init scripts and their methodology to |
| 20 |
(re)start/stop namespaces / containers / jails. Perhaps firejail will |
| 21 |
give me what I want or provide insight. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Grant. . . . |
| 27 |
unix || die |
Archives