| 1 |
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:00:55 Paul Colquhoun wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:40:48 walt wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:18:27 -0500 |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Alan Grimes <ALONZOTG@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Hey, thanks for putting out gcc 5.3... |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Unfortunately, it fails to bootstrap on my machine. I am getting |
| 9 |
> > > differences between the stage 2 and stage 3 compilers and it's |
| 10 |
> > > dying... =( |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I'm waiting for 5.3.1 before I even try to install it on my main |
| 13 |
> > desktop machine. But I've installed it in a virtual gentoo ~amd64 |
| 14 |
> > machine, so I know that the failure you are seeing was introduced when |
| 15 |
> > the 'jit' useflag was added to the gcc ebuild. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > You can work around the failure by installing 5.3.0 with the -jit |
| 18 |
> > useflag (which should succeed) and *then* switch to 5.3.0 using |
| 19 |
> > gcc-config before re-installing 5.3.0 with +jit. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > David mentioned that he succeeded by using gcc-4.9 but I had to use the |
| 22 |
> > workaround I described above. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I disabled the 'jit' flag for gcc, and 5.3.0 compiled cleanly. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Now to turn the flag back on and see if that works. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Yes, using gcc-5.3.0 to recompile 5.3.0 with +jit worked. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Thanks. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Reverend Paul Colquhoun, ULC. http://andor.dropbear.id.au/ |
| 36 |
Asking for technical help in newsgroups? Read this first: |
| 37 |
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#intro |
Archives