Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Todd Goodman <tsg@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone Else "Ping-Ponging" with fltk?
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:09:21
Message-Id: 20120403190657.GZ27585@ns1.bonedaddy.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone Else "Ping-Ponging" with fltk? by Maxim Wexler
1 * Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@×××××.com> [120403 14:55]:
2 > >>
3 > >> fltk-1.3 will handle what fltk-2.0 handled, unless you have some very
4 > >> hard-coded software.
5 > >>
6 > >> --
7 > >> Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
8 > >
9 > > Thanks Walter for the description of what the real problem is here.
10 > >
11 >
12 > from update -p world console o/p:
13 >
14 > <...>
15 > [ebuild NS ] x11-libs/fltk-1.3.0 [2.0_pre6970-r1] USE="threads
16 > -cairo -debug -doc -examples -games -opengl -pdf -xft -xinerama" 0 kB
17 > <...>
18 >
19 > Now portage is repeating itself. This is what I saw last update last
20 > week. Getting big yawns on irc #gentoo. Does this mean nobody knows or
21 > nobody cares what's going on? Or is there a third alternative I
22 > haven't considered?
23 >
24 > MW
25
26 Hi Maxim,
27
28 Do you need fltk-2.0_pre6970-r1?
29
30 If your emerge -C it then everything should be happy with just
31 fltk-1.3.0 (which is actually *more recent* than 2.0_pre6970-r1
32 according to Walter.)
33
34 Regards,
35
36 Todd