1 |
On 11/28/2010 07:39 PM, walt wrote: |
2 |
> On 11/27/2010 11:17 PM, App Deb wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de> |
4 |
>> wrote: |
5 |
>>> On 11/28/2010 01:03 AM, Stroller wrote: |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> On 27/11/2010, at 10:22pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
8 |
>>>>> |
9 |
>>>>> The ck patch set does not support group scheduling anyway; |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> Now I'm a little more confused. Does `ionice` need the CFQ scheduler? |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> Nope. I/O scheduling priorities are part of the I/O scheduler, not |
14 |
>>> the CPU |
15 |
>>> scheduler. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> CFQ is the official I/O scheduler. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> ionice only works with CFQ. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I'm confused about which of all these various mechanisms apply to |
22 |
> single-cpu |
23 |
> machines. AFAICT Con's BFS (e.g.) is really a CPU scheduler and doesn't |
24 |
> affect |
25 |
> single-cpu machines very much. |
26 |
|
27 |
The scheduler affects every system. Single-CPU systems also need to |
28 |
schedule processes. |
29 |
|
30 |
Anyway, did the ck kernel help in some way with your problem? |