| 1 |
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:52 AM, mike@×××××××.us <mike@×××××××.us> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/15/2012 08:38 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Thanks for the heads-up, last time I looked nemo was not in portage. I |
| 4 |
>> use gnome3.6 and dislike the new nautilus - still have version 3.4 of it |
| 5 |
>> installed. But now I can switch to nemo. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> GNOME 3.6 landed? I know it was released, but I still don't have it on |
| 8 |
> my system... I'm assuming that it requires more unmasking and |
| 9 |
> modification of the /etc/portage/* stuff? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
3.6 is not in the official tree, but it is in the GNOME overlay: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gnome.git;a=summary |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
(And yeah, it needs "unmasking and modification of the /etc/portage/* stuff"). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> (Incidentally, when will it become "stable" as a whole? I realize I |
| 18 |
> must be one of the very few dissenters to the subject here, but jhbuild |
| 19 |
> never works for me, and GNOME is the only thing that I don't fully have |
| 20 |
> that I want. That, and I want to check out the GNOME boxes feature...) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
We are not that few, we just don't scream so loudly ;) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I don't know when it will become stable, but at the sooner it will be |
| 25 |
with 3.8, I reckon. Probably 3.10. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
However, 3.6 is running pretty much great, but you kinda need to know |
| 28 |
what are you doing before starting to unmask and keyword stuff. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Regards. |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 33 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 34 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives