| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:34:52AM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked: |
| 2 |
> > Expected behaviour. >=gcc-4.2 compiles about three times longer than |
| 3 |
> > <gcc-4.2 (IIRC 4.1.2 was the last gcc that I could compile in under 30 |
| 4 |
> > minutes; the current one takes about 1.5 hours), and requires loads of |
| 5 |
> > disk. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> gcc is getting like ooO :-) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Any idea why? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Turns out that 4.3.2 required (on my laptop) just over 1 gig of space |
| 13 |
to compile. It is alright now, but if it gets any higher, I don't |
| 14 |
think my laptop with its puny 30 G harddrive will be able to handle |
| 15 |
building gcc. Will we see something like gcc-bin? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
W |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
In democracy it's your vote that counts. |
| 20 |
In feudalism it's your Count that votes. |
| 21 |
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 670 days, 12:48 |
Archives