| 1 |
On Monday 12 April 2010 16:55:38 Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I've been using portage unmasked for a very long time and don't |
| 4 |
> remember having any portage-related problems. I'm sure there must be |
| 5 |
> some (or else why is it still RC?) but for me the new features are |
| 6 |
> worth the potential risk of using less-tested code. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
There was a problem with its preserved-rebuild feature for a while; |
| 9 |
several people reported here that they were running it and being told |
| 10 |
they still needed to run it again. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
As far as I know, that's the only thing preventing release of v2, and I |
| 13 |
think it's been fixed anyway. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Rgds |
| 17 |
Peter. |
Archives