1 |
Andreas K. Hüttel schrieb: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2016, 12:54:37 schrieb hw: |
6 |
>> Hi, |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> I´m trying to upgrade portage because I´m getting a message that it |
9 |
>> needs to be able to work with EAPI 6 packages and can only do EAPI 5. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> I´m running into merge conflicts when trying to update portage, and |
12 |
>> apparently one of the packages (dev-python/cryptography) I could try |
13 |
>> to update first to be able to update portage requires a version of |
14 |
>> portage that can handle EAPI 6 packages. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> How can upgrade portage? |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> If you see this now, your production server hasn't been updated for a long |
20 |
> time... |
21 |
|
22 |
About 1.5 years --- not really a long time. |
23 |
|
24 |
> As a last resort, you should be able to run a "non-installed" portage version |
25 |
> to update your system once. Manually download and unpack a recent portage |
26 |
> tarball somewhere temporary and then run as root something like |
27 |
> |
28 |
> porto tmp # ./portage-2.3.0/bin/emerge -uDNav world |
29 |
> |
30 |
> This can update your system to the newest state, including updating the |
31 |
> installed portage. Afterwards you won't need the temporarily unpacked portage |
32 |
> anymore. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Disclaimer: I haven't tested this for a while. It may delete your data, kill |
35 |
> kittens or turn the sun into a nova. No guarantees made. |
36 |
|
37 |
Interesting idea :) I´d be afraid that this version of portage might |
38 |
find files of the regular installation and get confused and kill the |
39 |
kittens ... |