Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone Else "Ping-Ponging" with fltk? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:06:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120328170138.15540d2a@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone Else "Ping-Ponging" with fltk? by Todd Goodman |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:39:55 -0400, Todd Goodman wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > And more specifically, if the two versions of fltk are slotted it makes |
| 4 | > me even more surprised that portage wants to depclean the 1.3.0 version. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | It can't depclean the other version, because that slot is specifically |
| 7 | depended on. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Neil Bothwick |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Rainbows are just to look at, not to really understand. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |