1 |
Am 31.03.2013 05:12, schrieb Walter Dnes: |
2 |
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:04:24PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote |
3 |
>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
4 |
>>> Did an update today. After the update, I checked again... |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> [d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv --update --changed-use world |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> Calculating dependencies... done! |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> Good... nothing to add... I think. But replace "--update" with |
15 |
>>> "--emptytree", and a whole bunch of new and updated stuff shows up. Is |
16 |
>>> there a logical explanation? Should I emerge world? Or just the new |
17 |
>>> and updated stuff (with the -1 flag)? Here are listings of the new and |
18 |
>>> updated stuff... |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> The extra stuff is probably build-time deps, which do not get updated |
21 |
>> by default. Try this: |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> emerge -pv --update --changed-use --with-bdeps=y world |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I see nothing at all to be emerged... |
26 |
> |
27 |
> ==================================================================== |
28 |
> [d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv --update --changed-use --with-bdeps=y world |
29 |
> |
30 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Calculating dependencies... done! |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB |
35 |
> ==================================================================== |
36 |
|
37 |
You can also try adding --deep to your emerge options. |
38 |
|
39 |
Or double check with eix -u -c |
40 |
|
41 |
> |
42 |
> I've written an "autodepclean" script that I run to guide me through |
43 |
> cleaning up orphaned dependancies. Think of it as a "sane depclean". |
44 |
> After each use, I run revdep-rebuild to ensure that nothing is broken. |
45 |
> Could this be at the root of my situation? |
46 |
> |
47 |
|
48 |
What do you mean by sane depclean? Are there any problems with |
49 |
--depclean that I am not aware of? |