| 1 |
Hi again, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:38:47 -0300 |
| 4 |
"Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <buanzo@××××××××××.ar> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: |
| 7 |
> > Probably not. Since V4L is a kernel interface, you would need a dummy |
| 8 |
> > driver in the kernel. Probably the easiest way to archieve what you |
| 9 |
> > want is to write a module that provides a v4l interface to a dummy |
| 10 |
> > framebuffer. Not that I'm volunteering... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It seems I'll have to write it, or pay someone to do it. If anyone's willing, let me know. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I thought about this thing. I can't image what you're actually trying |
| 15 |
to archieve. Is this for recording? Streaming/broadcasting? Why does |
| 16 |
v4l compatibility matter? Maybe mpeg-out would be sufficient, or even a |
| 17 |
raw video stream (i.e. by other means than v4l). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-hwh |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives