Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:16:38
Message-Id: CAOTuDKqHBApgPOOsVdNBjeH24FoPZimKDkX0TYV6NugpA2kQ5A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] screen locker by Grant
1 On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Has anyone found a screen locker they like?  I'd like to move away
3 > from xscreensaver.  It seems bloated plus it isn't working right for
4 > me anymore.
5 >
6 > slimlock looks interesting but the ebuild in the miramir overlay fails with:
7 >
8 > !!! Fetched file: slimlock-9999.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED!
9 > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
10 > !!! Got:      21746
11 > !!! Expected: 21479
12 >
13 > and the comments in this bug aren't encouraging:
14 >
15 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366405
16 >
17 > - Grant
18 >
19
20 I find I like slock, though it's possibly a bit excessively on the
21 'minimalist' side for many people. Flat blanked screen, just type the
22 user's password and hit enter to unlock... there's no visual cues at
23 all. It also doesn't auto-enable on a timer by itself.
24
25 --
26 Poison [BLX]
27 Joshua M. Murphy

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker ny6p01@×××××.com