1 |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:40:08 +0800, Amankwah wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Maybe the only solution is that move the portage tree to HDD?? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Or tmpfs if you rarely reboot or have a fast enough connection to your |
7 |
> preferred portage mirror. |
8 |
|
9 |
There has been a proposal to move it to squashfs, which might |
10 |
potentially also help. |
11 |
|
12 |
The portage tree is 700M uncompressed, which seems like a bit much to |
13 |
just leave in RAM all the time. |
14 |
|
15 |
Mine is on an SSD, but the SMART attributes aren't well-documented so |
16 |
I have no idea what the erase count or WAF is - just the LBA written |
17 |
count. |
18 |
|
19 |
Rich |