Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [Gentoo-User] emerge --sync likely to kill SSD?
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:56:49
Message-Id: CAGfcS_kqQKVQLZm+ZOVpkuiCm1=q3Hq6y6keRPk=+5v+-sdG0g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [Gentoo-User] emerge --sync likely to kill SSD? by Neil Bothwick
1 On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 > On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:40:08 +0800, Amankwah wrote:
3 >
4 >> Maybe the only solution is that move the portage tree to HDD??
5 >
6 > Or tmpfs if you rarely reboot or have a fast enough connection to your
7 > preferred portage mirror.
8
9 There has been a proposal to move it to squashfs, which might
10 potentially also help.
11
12 The portage tree is 700M uncompressed, which seems like a bit much to
13 just leave in RAM all the time.
14
15 Mine is on an SSD, but the SMART attributes aren't well-documented so
16 I have no idea what the erase count or WAF is - just the LBA written
17 count.
18
19 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [Gentoo-User] emerge --sync likely to kill SSD? Kerin Millar <kerframil@×××××××××××.uk>