1 |
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:50:17 +0800 |
2 |
W.Kenworthy wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Not sure that is an official site ... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> The question came from a couple of posts where debian is showing ~17000 |
7 |
> packages and Fedora a couple of thousand less. They were bemoaning the |
8 |
> size of the install media. |
9 |
|
10 |
Don't these people have access to the worldwideintarwebthingy? why |
11 |
download media you don't need? just install the packages you want over a |
12 |
network. |
13 |
|
14 |
Where does the thousands come from with fedora? I count 965 source rpms |
15 |
on a fedora mirror i looked at. |
16 |
|
17 |
on the same mirror there were 1483 binary rpm's. of those 299 have |
18 |
"devel" in the filename, so will have been from a "split" build - ie one |
19 |
foo.src.rpm may become foo.i386.rpm, foo-devel.i386.rpm, |
20 |
foo-xorg.i386.rpm, foo-doc.i386.rpm etc. |
21 |
|
22 |
This filter shows me how many binary rpm's have unique names up the the |
23 |
first hyphen, : |
24 |
|
25 |
grep i386.rpm fedora.filelist |cut -d- -f1|sort|uniq|wc -l |
26 |
|
27 |
which gives 693 - but I don't know if thats an accurate way to tell if a |
28 |
built package comes from the same source package. |
29 |
|
30 |
But my real question is - how do you get thousands of fedora packages? |
31 |
so you have to scratch around private repositories looking for the ones |
32 |
with the stuff you want? |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
>The difference between distros is most |
37 |
> likely little used packages, and the fact that rpm's for instance split |
38 |
> headers and sometimes aux functions into separate packages, |
39 |
> approximately doubling the package count. I presume debian do the same. |
40 |
|
41 |
yes they do. usually called -dev rather than -devel from what i can see. |
42 |
|
43 |
> |
44 |
> billk |
45 |
> |
46 |
-- |
47 |
Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz> |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |