1 |
Alex Schuster wrote: |
2 |
> Dale writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I |
6 |
>> get only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver |
7 |
>> issue? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> Is OpenGL working at all? Does glxinfo produce lots of output, with |
10 |
> 'direct rendering: Yes' near the top? If not, your're using software |
11 |
> rendering, all is done by the CPU, not the GPU. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Wonko |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
That's what I am thinking. I notice here lately that my CPU is being |
17 |
used a LOT more then it used to when playing videos or something. I |
18 |
recently changed kernels and nvidia drivers, the kernel upgrade forced |
19 |
me to upgrade nvidia. It appears to have gotten worse with each |
20 |
upgrade. This is what I got from these two commands: |
21 |
|
22 |
root@smoker / # eselect opengl list |
23 |
Available OpenGL implementations: |
24 |
[1] nvidia * |
25 |
[2] xorg-x11 |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
root@smoker / # glxinfo |
29 |
name of display: :0.0 |
30 |
display: :0 screen: 0 |
31 |
direct rendering: Yes |
32 |
server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation |
33 |
server glx version string: 1.4 |
34 |
server glx extensions: |
35 |
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, |
36 |
GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control, |
37 |
GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_NV_float_buffer |
38 |
client glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation |
39 |
client glx version string: 1.4 |
40 |
client glx extensions: |
41 |
GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info, |
42 |
GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_SGI_video_sync, |
43 |
GLX_NV_swap_group, GLX_NV_video_out, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, |
44 |
GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, |
45 |
GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, |
46 |
GLX_EXT_fbconfig_packed_float, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, |
47 |
GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, GLX_NV_present_video |
48 |
GLX version: 1.3 |
49 |
GLX extensions: |
50 |
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, |
51 |
GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control, |
52 |
GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_NV_float_buffer, |
53 |
GLX_ARB_get_proc_address |
54 |
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation |
55 |
OpenGL renderer string: GeForce FX 5200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW! |
56 |
OpenGL version string: 2.1.2 NVIDIA 173.14.25 |
57 |
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20 NVIDIA via Cg compiler |
58 |
|
59 |
<<SNIPPED?? |
60 |
|
61 |
It says direct rendering is working but it sure doesn't act like it. I |
62 |
watched a video a bit ago and although it was a small thing, only took |
63 |
about 20% of my screen, it used just about all the CPU power. It didn't |
64 |
do that a few months or so ago. It used to take only 25% or so to do a |
65 |
full screen video. This is really weird. |
66 |
|
67 |
I did take the side off my case a hour or so ago. I took my air tank |
68 |
and blew it out pretty good. I also checked to make sure the fan was |
69 |
turning on the video card chip. It was spinning fine and I could feel a |
70 |
little bit of air. It's a small fan so I wasn't expecting a tornado or |
71 |
anything. Anyway, after blowing it out AND generating a xorg-conf with |
72 |
nvidia's program, I get this: |
73 |
|
74 |
root@smoker / # glxgears |
75 |
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be |
76 |
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate. |
77 |
2932 frames in 5.0 seconds = 586.390 FPS |
78 |
1260 frames in 5.7 seconds = 222.873 FPS |
79 |
2 frames in 7.6 seconds = 0.263 FPS |
80 |
2 frames in 8.0 seconds = 0.249 FPS |
81 |
2 frames in 7.6 seconds = 0.264 FPS |
82 |
2 frames in 7.7 seconds = 0.259 FPS |
83 |
XIO: fatal IO error 22 (Invalid argument) on X server ":0.0" |
84 |
after 58 requests (58 known processed) with 0 events remaining. |
85 |
root@smoker / # |
86 |
|
87 |
Well, if it wasn't bad enough before, it is really bad now. The first |
88 |
couple were when the window was really small. I adjusted it to full |
89 |
screen which is where the 0.2 FPS comes in. That used to be about 30 or |
90 |
so a while back. |
91 |
|
92 |
This is with the nvidia generated xorg.conf file. I'm going back to my |
93 |
hand made one. It seems to be a little better. |
94 |
|
95 |
Any ideas as to why everything says it is working but it isn't? |
96 |
|
97 |
Dale |
98 |
|
99 |
:-) :-) |