Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is perl broken?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:26:44
Message-Id: 34848643.94B99lRfOc@wstn
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is perl broken? by Peter Humphrey
1 On Tuesday 07 April 2015 23:19:18 I wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 07 April 2015 15:02:36 walt wrote:
3 > > On 04/07/2015 02:48 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
4 > > > On Tuesday 07 April 2015 22:24:38 Peter Humphrey wrote:
5 > > >> $ cat make.conf # I made a local copy and removed a lot of
6 comments
7 > > >> #CFLAGS="-O2 -march=core2 -pipe" [1]
8 > > >
9 > > > --->8
10 > > >
11 > > >> [1] This bothers me. Various docs tell me to specify march=corei7,
12 > > >> but
13 > > >> this is an i5 CPU. Could this be my problem?
14 > >
15 > > Any reason you don't want to use march=native?
16 >
17 > Not that I can think of now. I'll try it - thanks, both of you.
18
19 Countless CPU cycles later, I have now reinstalled my complete system with
20 -march=native.
21
22 I had another problem to keep me amused - KMail decided I'd deleted the
23 folder into which it receives all inbound mail. I hadn't, of course, but
24 suddenly my 13000 mails were gone - vanished. So I had to create a new user
25 and import them all from the previous day's backup. Tedium - yawn...
26
27 Still all my filters have gone though, and I'll have to define new ones as I
28 need them. Oh well, I suppose it's about time I cleaned them out.
29
30 Back to the original theme, I'd been experimenting with -j and -l make
31 options, and I suspect that was my real problem. All seems stable so far, so
32 I'll watch with interest.
33
34 --
35 Rgds
36 Peter