From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Why is xulrunner-bin required for acroread in amd64 (xulrunner not OK) | ||
Date: | Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:02:14 | ||
Message-Id: | 20090227000203.239b91be@krikkit.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Why is xulrunner-bin required for acroread in amd64 (xulrunner not OK) by Allan Gottlieb |
1 | On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:47:51 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > But why are the -bin packages good and the compile-from-source not good? |
4 | |
5 | Because the -bin package is 32-bit, like acroread itself. |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | -- |
9 | Neil Bothwick |
10 | |
11 | Monday is the root of all evil! |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Why is xulrunner-bin required for acroread in amd64 (xulrunner not OK) | Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> |