Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:06:36
Message-Id: 20120327220128.GB3437@acm.acm
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs? by Neil Bothwick
1 Hello, Neil.
2
3 On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:41:53PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
4 > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:24:22 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
5
6 > > That is precisely what the question was NOT about. The idea was to copy
7 > > (not move) booting software to /sbin instead of an initramfs - the exact
8 > > same programs, modulo noise - to have the SW in /sbin necessary to mount
9 > > /usr.
10
11 > Your package manager only knows about the copy in the original location.
12
13 So? The same applies to a copy in the initramfs.
14
15 > When you update you'll have multiple versions of the same program or
16 > library in your path.
17
18 Well, with the manual/script copying which needs doing either for /sbin
19 or initramfs, that will be several copies of a program, not several
20 versions.
21
22 I'm still trying to see the reason why an /sbin with the same contents as
23 a putative initramfs won't work.
24
25 > --
26 > Neil Bothwick
27
28 --
29 Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

Replies