Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: walt <w41ter@×××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: Fighting bit rot
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:59:49
Message-Id: 1576381.e1fgp8ABYZ@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: Fighting bit rot by walt
1 Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013, 07:17:25 schrieb walt:
2 > On 01/08/2013 08:40 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
3 > > Am Dienstag, 8. Januar 2013, 19:11:19 schrieb James:
4 > >> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin <at> googlemail.com> writes:
5 > >>
6 > >> Comments/guidance on ZFS vs BTFRS are welcome. I never used ZFS; googling
7 > >> suggests lots of disdain for ZFS ? Maybe someone knows a good article
8 > >> or wiki discussion where the various merits of the currently available
9 > >> file
10 > >> systems are presented?
11 > >
12 > > does btrfs support raid levels others than 1?
13 > >
14 > > zfs does. Is freaking easy to set up and to use. Can handle swap files and
15 > > supports dedup.
16 > > is not linux-only.
17 >
18 > Are you using the gentoo zfs and zfs-kmod packages to get zfs support?
19
20 yes.
21
22 > Are
23 > they ready for prime time?
24
25 they work for me. I don't use latest-and-greatest kernels and I use vanilla
26 kernel.org sources.
27
28 zpool status
29 pool: zfstank
30 state: ONLINE
31 status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
32 corruption. Applications may be affected.
33 action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the
34 entire pool from backup.
35 see: http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-8A
36 scan: scrub repaired 0 in 3h23m with 9 errors on Sat Jan 5 05:47:34 2013
37 config:
38
39 NAME STATE READ WRITE
40 CKSUM
41 zfstank ONLINE 0 0
42 0
43 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0
44 0
45 ata-Hitachi_HDS5C3020ALA632_ML4230FA17X6EK ONLINE 0 0
46 0
47 ata-Hitachi_HDS5C3020ALA632_ML4230FA17X6HK ONLINE 0 0
48 0
49 ata-Hitachi_HDS5C3020ALA632_ML4230FA17X7YK ONLINE 0 0
50 0
51
52 errors: 9 data errors, use '-v' for a list
53
54 those errors were caused by a memory glitch (and are video files... so... I
55 don't even care about them - also they are still on two different backup
56 media...), But zfs caught these errors. ext4? I really doubt it.
57
58 --
59 #163933