| 1 |
Dan Farrell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:05:07 +0200 |
| 3 |
> pk <peterk2@××××××××.se> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> gentoo.org works for me (both this afternoon, around 15.00 and right |
| 6 |
>> now, 20.03). f.g.o. also works right now. g-w.com also works. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Your're all right; the gentoo.org thing must have been a transient |
| 9 |
> hiccough somewhere between me and them. Forum is working fine too. I |
| 10 |
> was too quick to criticize. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Also, gentoo-wiki _just_ came back up, apparently. Nevertheless I |
| 13 |
> think anyone who uses it agrees that it goes down _too_much_. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I know, these aren't the gentoo people on the wiki. I'm more concerned |
| 16 |
> with the hole it leaves when it disappears than I am with pointing |
| 17 |
> fingers. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'd like to see the conversation about Gentoo hosting docs in a wiki |
| 21 |
rather than the XML stuff we've got now picked up again. My time is |
| 22 |
limited and I'm not going to learn a whole doc system when I can just |
| 23 |
fix the docs in a tenth of the time it takes to even figure out where to |
| 24 |
get the Gentoo docs in order to edit them. Hell someone can wiki -> xml |
| 25 |
the thing and create official releases every couple of months while the |
| 26 |
wiki docs continue on as unstable releases. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
kashani |
Archives