| 1 |
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:49:15 -0500, Jack wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a |
| 4 |
> > dependency conflict: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > media-gfx/imagemagick:0 |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.7:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled |
| 9 |
> > for merge) conflicts with |
| 10 |
> > <media-gfx/imagemagick-7:0/6.9.10.77=[cxx] required by |
| 11 |
> > (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta2:0/0::gentoo, installed) |
| 12 |
> > ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| 13 |
> > <media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx] required by |
| 14 |
> > (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta2:0/0::gentoo, installed) |
| 15 |
> > ^ ^ |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Cheers! |
| 18 |
> Well, that does seem relevant. Since you accept testing versions, it |
| 19 |
> wants to upgrade to 7.0.9.0, but inkskape prevents that, as it requires |
| 20 |
> a version less than 7. As Dale pointed out, you do need to have the |
| 21 |
> cxx use flag set for imagemagick, but I suspect you do, or portage |
| 22 |
> would complain even more. What is not clear to me is why it insists on |
| 23 |
> reinstalling 6.10.9.77 just because it can't upgrade. Does anyone |
| 24 |
> think it might be a (subtle or not so) bug in portage? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
That's the odd part. The warning is just that, it is portage telling you |
| 27 |
why it is not upgrading imagemagick to the latest version. I can't see |
| 28 |
anything in the output you have posted that explains portage's desire to |
| 29 |
continually reinstall the same version of imagemagick. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I think it was suggested earlier, but have you tried setting the |
| 32 |
graphicsmagick flag for inkscape? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
"There's more to life than sex, beer and computers. |
| 39 |
Not a lot more admittedly..." |
Archives