| 1 |
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 20:51:10 Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2011/6/8 Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>: |
| 3 |
> > 1&1: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Test mit IPv4 DNS Eintrag |
| 6 |
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv4 |
| 7 |
> > Test mit IPv6 DNS Eintrag |
| 8 |
> > ok (0.712s) verwende ipv6 6to4 |
| 9 |
> > Test mit Dual Stack DNS Eintrag |
| 10 |
> > ok (0.726s) verwende ipv4 |
| 11 |
> > Test mit Dual Stack und grosse Pakete |
| 12 |
> > ok (0.665s) verwende ipv4 |
| 13 |
> > Test IPv4 ohne DNS |
| 14 |
> > ok (0.417s) verwende ipv4 |
| 15 |
> > Test IPv6 ohne DNS |
| 16 |
> > ok (0.440s) verwende ipv6 6to4 |
| 17 |
> > Test grosse IPv6 Pakete |
| 18 |
> > ok (0.734s) verwende ipv6 6to4 |
| 19 |
> > Test ob der DNS server des ISP IPv6 unterstützt |
| 20 |
> > bad (1.401s) |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > as the site explains the dns test is a goodie and failing it is not a big |
| 23 |
> > deal. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Charter Communications cable internet: |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Test with IPv4 DNS record |
| 28 |
> ok (0.580s) using ipv4 |
| 29 |
> Test with IPv6 DNS record |
| 30 |
> ok (0.268s) using ipv6 |
| 31 |
> Test with Dual Stack DNS record |
| 32 |
> ok (0.256s) using ipv6 |
| 33 |
> Test for Dual Stack DNS and large packet |
| 34 |
> ok (0.090s) using ipv6 |
| 35 |
> Test IPv4 without DNS |
| 36 |
> ok (0.148s) using ipv4 |
| 37 |
> Test IPv6 without DNS |
| 38 |
> ok (0.162s) using ipv6 |
| 39 |
> Test IPv6 large packet |
| 40 |
> ok (0.092s) using ipv6 |
| 41 |
> Test if your ISP's DNS server uses IPv6 |
| 42 |
> ok (0.316s) using ipv6 |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> :) |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
I find this rather confusing! Paul is your ISP offering native IPv6 and if |
| 47 |
they do does your router speak ipv6? |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
What does your /etc/resolv.conf show? |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
When I run this test I get: |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Test with IPv4 DNS record |
| 55 |
ok (0.552s) using ipv4 |
| 56 |
Test with IPv6 DNS record |
| 57 |
bad (0.197s) |
| 58 |
Test with Dual Stack DNS record |
| 59 |
ok (0.558s) using ipv4 |
| 60 |
Test for Dual Stack DNS and large packet |
| 61 |
ok (0.239s) using ipv4 |
| 62 |
Test IPv4 without DNS |
| 63 |
ok (0.368s) using ipv4 |
| 64 |
Test IPv6 without DNS |
| 65 |
bad (0.022s) |
| 66 |
Test IPv6 large packet |
| 67 |
bad (0.025s) |
| 68 |
Test if your ISP's DNS server uses IPv6 |
| 69 |
ok (0.691s) using ipv4 |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
When I run it with Windows 7 I get: |
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
Test with IPv4 DNS record |
| 74 |
ok (0.689s) using ipv4 |
| 75 |
Test with IPv6 DNS record |
| 76 |
bad (0.022s) |
| 77 |
Test with Dual Stack DNS record |
| 78 |
ok (0.544s) using ipv4 |
| 79 |
Test for Dual Stack DNS and large packet |
| 80 |
ok (0.241s) using ipv4 |
| 81 |
Test IPv4 without DNS |
| 82 |
ok (0.384s) using ipv4 |
| 83 |
Test IPv6 without DNS |
| 84 |
ok (3.593s) using ipv6 Teredo |
| 85 |
Test IPv6 large packet |
| 86 |
bad (0.018s) |
| 87 |
Test if your ISP's DNS server uses IPv6 |
| 88 |
ok (0.387s) using ipv4 |
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
From Windows7 I can ping ipv6 addresses (but not domain names) because it uses |
| 91 |
Teredo, but from Linux I cannot. |
| 92 |
-- |
| 93 |
Regards, |
| 94 |
Mick |
Archives