1 |
On 09/29/2013 01:55 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:55:49PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: |
3 |
>> On 2013-09-28 6:36 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> So this brings us back to the essential technical problem that still |
5 |
>>> needs to be solved on your machines: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> /usr needs to be available (and not only for BT keyboards) at the |
8 |
>>> earliest possible opportunity - this is a technical constraint. To |
9 |
>>> guarantee that, you need to either merge /usr with /, or use an |
10 |
>>> initramfs to guarantee that /usr is available before anything else |
11 |
>>> happens in userland. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> It*really* is that simple. If you have a better solution than my last |
14 |
>>> two choices, then I am all ears. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Ok, and if this is all true, I can accept it. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Alan, this is a very good summary of the issues involved. Everyone on |
19 |
> the list should go and read flameeyes' blog post then this summary. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Tanstaaf, |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I am the OpenRC author/maintainer and a member of base-system. I can |
24 |
> tell you that we are not discussing forcing systemd on everyone in |
25 |
> Gentoo Linux as a default init system. I can also tell you that I am not |
26 |
> aware of the Gentoo systemd team discussing this. Even if they were, a |
27 |
> distro-wide change like this would have to be brought before the |
28 |
> Council. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> William |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
I understand Gentoo has a much more structured way of making decisions |
34 |
like systemd, but perhaps you aren't the best person to assuage fears. I |
35 |
say this not because of anything you do, but your position. Arch Linux |
36 |
used their sysvinit maintainer to calm fears of users before their |
37 |
switch to systemd. I'm not saying that you are trying to do this at all, |
38 |
but rather being OpenRC maintainer doesn't add much in the way of |
39 |
credibility of your stance. Everything else (the lack of discussion on |
40 |
it, the fact that the Council would have to vote on it) are much better |
41 |
logical support for systemd not being forced. |
42 |
|
43 |
I'm not sure if you knew about what happened with Arch, so I just |
44 |
figured I'd point it out. I and others who switched from Arch to Gentoo |
45 |
over the systemd debacle still remember the false promises (from the |
46 |
sysvinit maintainer) that systemd won't be forced, when it was. So one's |
47 |
position can't really be trusted, regardless of how much I and others |
48 |
appreciate the work that goes into OpenRC. |
49 |
|
50 |
No offense is intended, by the way. Just adding some context. I hope you |
51 |
understand. |