| 1 |
On 3/9/20 11:35 AM, Consus wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> But maybe the person who maintains ebuild does not have enough time to |
| 4 |
> ensure that all QA requirements are met. E.g. installing (willingly) an |
| 5 |
> unstable package is not the same as installing a "stable" package that |
| 6 |
> in fact is not. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
No one even agrees on what "stable" means, so I can't make any promises. |
| 10 |
But ideally, the maintainer would determine which of the two cases ("I |
| 11 |
forgot" or "this package is junk") applies and make a decision based on |
| 12 |
that. |
Archives