| 1 |
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Thanks Mike, I didn't know about ppapi - or that this is available as a |
| 4 |
> separate package. Shouldn't it be drawn in as dependency by Chromium, or |
| 5 |
> at |
| 6 |
> least done so by some USE flag? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins will get you chrome-style flash and pdf |
| 10 |
viewing. As for everything else... well, I have been finding lots of uses |
| 11 |
for firefox lately... There is a patch out there to re-enable npapi but |
| 12 |
it's no panacea, believe me. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Anyone know of a good chromium fork with less borg-ware and anti-features |
| 15 |
in it? I'm starting to get fed up. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-gmt |
Archives