1 |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> For the release to use new packages with their new magic features, |
3 |
> every other package using those packages must also be recompiled |
4 |
|
5 |
I see now. |
6 |
|
7 |
> The only sane way to deal with this is to peg |
8 |
> the packages at version levels and stick with it. |
9 |
|
10 |
I see |
11 |
|
12 |
> that's the only |
13 |
> thing that could work. |
14 |
|
15 |
I completely get it now. Great explanation, thank you! I'm a little |
16 |
embarrassed though that I didn't consider there was a technical reason |
17 |
for the major versions. I just assumed it was done for marketing |
18 |
reasons. |
19 |
|
20 |
Chris |