1 |
Devon Miller <devon.c.miller@×××××.com>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> You both seem to be arguing about what constitutes stable. |
4 |
|
5 |
Yep. For emerge, all that matters is the tree. Nothing else is |
6 |
important - actually, nothing else exists, as overlays also become |
7 |
part of the tree, sort of. |
8 |
|
9 |
> And there are 2 |
10 |
> different definitions: stable as defined by the upstream source and stable |
11 |
> as defined in portage. |
12 |
|
13 |
Yep. The latter is all that matters for emerge. |
14 |
|
15 |
> Not appreciating the distinction, Maxim was asking why he's not getting the |
16 |
> latest stable (expecting the "upstream stable"). |
17 |
|
18 |
We don't know what Maxim expected. Hence my question. |
19 |
|
20 |
> Alexander's comments reflect the "portage stable", |
21 |
|
22 |
Yes. |
23 |
|
24 |
> but don't take in to |
25 |
> account that portage does not always keep up. |
26 |
|
27 |
As it doesn't matter to what emerge offers. |
28 |
|
29 |
> In fact, in this case it's |
30 |
> languished rather badly. |
31 |
|
32 |
Yes. |
33 |
|
34 |
> His issue is 0.9.1 and 0.9.2 should have been stable by now. |
35 |
|
36 |
I agree with this. |
37 |
|
38 |
> |
39 |
> So, while Alexander is technically correct, (emerge is doing exactly what it |
40 |
> should) |
41 |
|
42 |
Yep. I asked, why maxim expected a different result. |
43 |
|
44 |
> this not a good thing, because portage is still delivering older, |
45 |
> buggy code. |
46 |
|
47 |
Yep. |
48 |
|
49 |
> I would suggest Darren look through the develoiper list ( |
50 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/userinfo.xml) for developers |
51 |
> handling media-sound. Add them to the cc list on the 0.9.2 ebuild and add a |
52 |
> comment asking that it be marked stable. And ask for the 0.9.3 to be added |
53 |
> as ~x86 |
54 |
|
55 |
Very good suggestion! |
56 |
|
57 |
Alexander Skwar |
58 |
-- |
59 |
* BenC wonders why he has upgraded to 3.3.5-1 before teh X maintainer |
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |