| 1 |
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:29:45 +0200, hw wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> >> About 1.5 years --- not really a long time. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > You're kidding, right? You're running a production server without the |
| 6 |
> > last 18 months' worth of security updates? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> What can you do when you don´t have the time to do the updates, |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On a *production* server? You either find or buy the time. The |
| 11 |
alternatives are much worse. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> especially when you know that they will give you trouble and can take |
| 14 |
> all day or even longer. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You've got yourself into a loop here. You won't update often because you |
| 17 |
get problems when doing so, but those problems occur because you don't |
| 18 |
update often enough. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Q: What's the proper plural of a 'Net-connected Windows machine? |
| 25 |
A: A Botnet |
Archives