1 |
I have followed the same procedure as suggested by Ilya Hegai and my |
2 |
result was the same as Gian. |
3 |
It works fine now, many thanks for the help. |
4 |
|
5 |
stu |
6 |
|
7 |
On 17/11/06, Gian Domeni Calgeer <gidoca@×××.ch> wrote: |
8 |
> Am Freitag, 17. November 2006 22:35 schrieb Stuart Howard: |
9 |
> > Its nice to hear somone else with the issue [if you see what I mean], |
10 |
> > if I take the -C ,delete old bits and emerge amarok approach where |
11 |
> > should I be looking for scraps? [not to disagree by the way but how |
12 |
> > does this acheive something different from just emerging amarok?] |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > stu |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > On 17/11/06, Ilya Hegai <vyacheslavovich@×××××.com> wrote: |
17 |
> > > unmerge amarok |
18 |
> > > then remove all traces left like *.la files |
19 |
> > > reemerge amarok |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Hi |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I did as Ilya Hegai suggested, i.e. I unmerged Amarok, did a 'find /usr -name |
24 |
> *amarok*' and deleted all the .la files this returned, which were: |
25 |
> |
26 |
> - /usr/kde/3.5/lib64/kde3/libamarok_void-engine_plugin.la |
27 |
> - /usr/kde/3.5/lib64/kde3/libamarok_gstengine_plugin.la |
28 |
> - /usr/kde/3.5/lib64/kde3/libamarok_xine-engine.la |
29 |
> - /usr/kde/3.5/lib64/kde3/konqsidebar_universalamarok.la |
30 |
> |
31 |
> After having reemerged Amarok, it works. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Gian |
34 |
> -- |
35 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
"There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand |
42 |
binary, those who don't" |
43 |
|
44 |
--Unknown |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |