1 |
Really large inline replies with five people and thirteen separate |
2 |
arguments are pretty much unreadable. I'm all for fighting things out to |
3 |
bitter end, but not when it's impossible to follow along. I'd recommend |
4 |
the following: |
5 |
|
6 |
1. snip. snip a lot. Keep the point you're arguing and snip the rest. If |
7 |
someone can't follow then they should check the archives or use a |
8 |
threaded client. |
9 |
|
10 |
2. Paragraphs and summaries are your friends. Here's an example. |
11 |
|
12 |
"We agree on points a and b so I'll skip them for now. However you say x |
13 |
and y are the best choices for w reasons. I say sure x is fine, but only |
14 |
with z. And y by itself is right out because of i, j, and k." |
15 |
|
16 |
Also you can work an insult in a little easier. Something like, "You're |
17 |
under the delusion that x and y are the best choices and then proceed to |
18 |
misunderstand w as some logic for your nonsense." |
19 |
|
20 |
Now you've made the other guy sound like a complete knucklehead while |
21 |
showing that you do understand his so called logic while summing it up |
22 |
for the rest of us and follow it up with a your own argument which reads |
23 |
and flows nicely without having to parse thirty lines hidden in two |
24 |
hundred lines of quotes. :-) |
25 |
|
26 |
kashani |
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |