| 1 |
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:57:19AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Honestly, as somebody who monitors all the systemd bugs on Gentoo it |
| 3 |
> isn't actually that much work, and I suspect that it wouldn't be that |
| 4 |
> much work maintaining openrc scripts on Arch. I doubt they rename the |
| 5 |
> apache binary 3x per year, or move its location around the filesystem. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Maybe not the apache binary, but who keeps track of things like sticking |
| 8 |
the logrotate cronjob into systemd timer unit files (something I just |
| 9 |
recently experienced on an Arch machine when I was looking for where |
| 10 |
logrotate was called from and how often)? Changes to mount units? Other |
| 11 |
things absorbed by systemd? It's not like going without systemd is just |
| 12 |
about setting different compilation options on upstream software. Not to |
| 13 |
mention upstream software that has a hard dependency on systemd, like |
| 14 |
GNOME I have heard -- these are going to require patching. Things like |
| 15 |
these are going to grow rather than shrink, so I expect much work to come |
| 16 |
onto the no-systemd people. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Greetings |
| 19 |
Marvin |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Blog: https://www.guelkerdev.de |
| 23 |
PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F |
Archives