Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] SOLVED [was: vmware problem]
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:40:47
Message-Id: 20080613184044.5a8d3acc@osage.osagesoftware.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] vmware problem by Iain Buchanan
1 On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:06:01 +0930
2 Iain Buchanan wrote:
3
4 > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 21:16 -0400, David Relson wrote:
5 > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:23:51 +0930
6 > > Iain Buchanan wrote:
7 > >
8 > > > David - at this point I'd try a couple of things. Since you've
9 > > > upgraded your linux-headers, it's a good idea to recompile your
10 > > > system libc, as per the elog message.
11 > > >
12 > > > Also, since you're getting version error messages, recompile your
13 > > > kernel and reboot into it. Just to make sure, as you've just done
14 > > > headers and libc (may be a long shot, but may as well rule it
15 > > > out).
16 > > >
17 > > > Then unload all vm* modules and recompile them also. (Say no to
18 > > > all vmware-config questions first, then second time around say
19 > > > yes!). If it doesn't work, downgrade to a previous version of
20 > > > modules and try them. I use vmware-modules-1.0.0.11-r1 because
21 > > > that's the only version that works with workstation 4, which I
22 > > > have a license for.
23 > > >
24 > > > Finally, if this all still fails, try with an earlier kernel and
25 > > > see if it magically works. Then you know it's probably a new
26 > > > kernal feature thats bugging you!
27 > > >
28 > > > I hope you have a few spare clock cycles for all this compiling :)
29 > >
30 > > Hi Iain,
31 > >
32 > > I've been using 'uname -r' and its reporting '2.6.25-gentoo-r4'
33 > > matches the module path,
34 > > i.e. /lib/modules/2.6.25-gentoo-r4/misc/vmnet.ko, in the "invalid
35 > > module" message. I'm as certain as can be that there's no mismatch
36 > > here.
37 >
38 > don't be so sure! Do you know that you won't get the same message if,
39 > for example, you used different compilers for the kernel and the
40 > module? In my experience, this message can appear when the actual
41 > kernel number is ok, but it's been compiled differently...
42 >
43 > > Also, I've removed all vm* packages and reinstalled vmware-server
44 > > (and whatever it pulls in, i.e. vmware-modules). This was done
45 > > after removing all vmware entries from /etc/portage/package*, so
46 > > the vm* packages are all stable versions -- no ~amd64 versions.
47 > >
48 > > Haven't tried rebuilding glibc ...
49 > >
50 > > Instead I've installed the latest stable amd64 versions of 2.6.24
51 > > sources and headers. The kernel is now being built. I should know
52 > > before too long whether this helps.
53 >
54 > good! Let's see what happens...
55
56 I've reverted to 2.6.24, emerged vmware-modules, run vmware-config.pl
57 and am pleased to report that the vmware-modules are loading without
58 complaint and that vmware-server is running.
59
60 I did _not_ disable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS or rebuild glibc.
61
62 Regards,
63
64 David
65 --
66 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Vmware and <= 2.6.25 kernels Eric Phillips <neuro.meltdown@×××××.com>