| 1 |
On 06/24/2014 04:28 PM, meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
| 2 |
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTY1MDU with |
| 3 |
> sentences like: "The Btrfs file-system changes for the Linux 3.15 |
| 4 |
> kernel mostly deal with bug fixes and performance fixes while some |
| 5 |
> corruption fixes are also expected to come." ...sounds a little |
| 6 |
> different to "stable" I think... What do you think? |
| 7 |
i hear ya, but if all you are doing is something like code i submitted, |
| 8 |
you have no concerns. |
| 9 |
even ext4 had an odd corruption bug not too long ago, and that was after |
| 10 |
it was stable. |
| 11 |
more importantly there is a wide group of folks using btrfs and active |
| 12 |
development. |
| 13 |
I wouldn't bother with ext2 and ext3 -- fsck will take _forever_ and |
| 14 |
heavens help you if you unplug the usb without unmounting |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
if you are that concerned you might want to make one drive ext4, one |
| 17 |
drive btrfs (or another pairing of your choice) |
| 18 |
and you can then guard against the filesystem choice by cycling the |
| 19 |
disks daily/weekly |
Archives