Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:32:31
Message-Id: CAGfcS_n9zD9ZF6qM-SoC1MnpSbHc7ryNfj1NhO9hk5aSzD5OXA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils by "J. Roeleveld"
1 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:13 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > It is marked stable. Otherwise it wouldn't cause blockers because it
3 > attempts to force an installation of systemd.
4
5 The issue isn't really that upower requires systemd so much as that
6 portage can't figure out that it makes more sense in this case to
7 switch to upower-pm-utils.
8
9 Sure, you could satisfy the dependency graph by switching from udev to
10 systemd, but portage doesn't have any way to know that doing this is a
11 huge change to the system vs just switching to the alternative upower.
12 It is just trying to find a set of packages that satisfy the
13 dependencies and the solution it settled on works, and is the
14 preferred solution since kdelibs lists upower first.
15
16 The real solution here is better communication. There is a blurb
17 going into the next GMN, but it doesn't mention stable users, and
18 obviously the timing isn't right.
19
20 Rich