Archives
Archives
| From: | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Linux Magazine tests Gentoo performance | ||
| Date: | Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:14:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | hcd0ib$3lk$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Linux Magazine tests Gentoo performance by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | On 10/29/2009 10:45 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 | > I suppose this is interesting to most Gentoo users. Linux Magazine |
| 3 | > performed a detailed benchmark of Gentoo, comparing it to Ubuntu 9.04: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7574/1 |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Btw, I think this is a very nice example of why per-package CFLAGS would |
| 8 | have been very useful. Some application largely benefit from -Os, others |
| 9 | from -O2. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Linux Magazine tests Gentoo performance | Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org> |