| 1 |
On Thursday 29 October 2009 16:59:24 James wrote: |
| 2 |
> Stroller <stroller <at> stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes: |
| 3 |
> > I think that alternative methods of approaching system administration |
| 4 |
> > are sure to bring their own problems and require an investment of time |
| 5 |
> > to implement, but I don't see how upgrading machines one by one is |
| 6 |
> > sustainable. Honestly, it would be driving me crazy to be in your |
| 7 |
> > position, and I think some other alternative might well show time and |
| 8 |
> > hassle saved once it's up and running. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> OK guys. |
| 11 |
> Thanks for the unecessary tongue lashing. |
| 12 |
> The systems rarely are at my location. I just cannot upgrade them |
| 13 |
> at my decision, as they belong to others. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Ah. That explains a lot. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
You can ignore my other mail of 10 minutes ago about updating multiple |
| 19 |
machines simultaneously. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives