| 1 |
On 2014-10-15, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Grant Edwards |
| 3 |
><grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On 2014-10-15, Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> The main problem (imnho) is that you think CentOS cares about |
| 7 |
>>> configurability/multiple ways of doing things. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Oh, I don't think that -- it's pretty obvious that in the RedHat |
| 10 |
>> world, choice is not an option. It's one prix fixe menu, and you can |
| 11 |
>> either eat what's set in front of you or go hungry. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I can see the potential benefits of that. It sounds a bit like the |
| 14 |
> whole convention over configuration approach. As long as the |
| 15 |
> convention works, it does greatly simplify things. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The main benefit is it makes the support scripts far simpler to write. |
| 18 |
The sooner you can get to "I'm sorry, that's not supported", the |
| 19 |
sooner you can hang up and "handle" the next customer. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Did you move a lot of |
| 23 |
at KOREAN STEAK KNIVES this |
| 24 |
gmail.com trip, Dingy? |
Archives